Compare tools

Datadog vs New Relic

Compare Datadog and New Relic on deployment, pricing and source model before you shortlist.

Scroll horizontally to compare every column →

Attribute	DatadogOther license	New RelicOther license
Category	Monitoring & Observability	Monitoring & Observability
Primary focus	Observe infrastructure and applications	Application and infrastructure telemetry in one workflow
Deployment	Web	Not specified
Source model	Other license	Other license
Pricing model	paid	freemium
API available	Yes	Not specified
Vendor website	Visit vendor ↗	Visit vendor ↗
ITHub profile	View full profile →	View full profile →

ⓘ Confirm technical details and prices with each vendor before making a decision. Want a third tool in the mix? Open the interactive comparison →

Technical decision guide

Start with the architecture and workload

Both products target managed full-stack observability. The practical decision is usually driven by telemetry coverage, query workflow, pricing dimensions, team access and how much configuration is required to reach a useful incident view.

Compare them with identical applications, hosts, telemetry volume and retention. Do not compare a small trial in one platform with a projected production configuration in the other.

Compare these first

Agent and OpenTelemetry support
Logs, metrics, traces and browser coverage
Query language and investigation workflow
Ingestion, retention, users and feature-based pricing

Shortlist Datadog when

Shortlist Datadog when broad infrastructure integrations and a unified managed workflow match the team's operating model.

Shortlist New Relic when

Shortlist New Relic when its telemetry model, query experience and current account structure fit the team's data and user patterns.

Run this proof of concept

Send the same OpenTelemetry and infrastructure data to both platforms for a bounded trial. Rebuild two production dashboards and three alerts, then compare investigation time and the projected bill.

Migration and rollback

Inventory data, identities, integrations and configuration. Test export, import and rollback with production-like data.

Security and operations

Compare access controls, audit evidence, upgrade ownership, observability and recovery procedures.

Total cost

Model licensing, infrastructure, support, data transfer and operator time at the expected scale.

Verify with official sources:Datadog documentation ↗New Relic documentation ↗Datadog pricing ↗New Relic pricing ↗

Evaluation methodology · Corrections process

Limits to confirm

Do not shortlist until these are tested

Datadog

Confirm data residency, export and vendor-exit requirements because self-hosting is not recorded.
Test API coverage, authentication, rate limits and failure handling against the target workflow.
Review license, renewal and portability terms because an open-source license is not recorded.

New Relic

Confirm data residency, export and vendor-exit requirements because self-hosting is not recorded.
Verify the required automation and integration surface; an API is not recorded in the profile.
Review license, renewal and portability terms because an open-source license is not recorded.

Official sources and directory fields checked for this comparison on October 3, 2026. Recheck current release notes, prices and plan limits before procurement.

Frequently asked questions

Is Datadog or New Relic open source?

Datadog is not open source (proprietary or source-available). New Relic is not open source (proprietary or source-available).

What is the pricing model for Datadog vs New Relic?

Datadog uses a paid pricing model. New Relic uses a freemium pricing model. Confirm current rates with each vendor before deciding.

Can Datadog and New Relic be self-hosted?

Datadog is not offered as a self-hosted option. New Relic is not offered as a self-hosted option.