Compare tools
Bitbucket vs Travis CI
Compare Bitbucket and Travis CI on deployment, pricing and source model before you shortlist.
| Attribute |  BitbucketOther license |  Travis CIOther license |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD | CI/CD |
| Primary focus | Git hosting and Pipelines from Atlassian | Hosted continuous integration for repository builds |
| Deployment | Not specified | Not specified |
| Source model | Other license | Other license |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| API available | Yes | Not specified |
| Vendor website | Visit vendor ↗ | Visit vendor ↗ |
| ITHub profile | View full profile → | View full profile → |
ⓘ Confirm technical details and prices with each vendor before making a decision. Want a third tool in the mix? Open the interactive comparison →
Frequently asked questions
Is Bitbucket or Travis CI open source?
Bitbucket is not open source (proprietary or source-available). Travis CI is not open source (proprietary or source-available).
What is the pricing model for Bitbucket vs Travis CI?
Bitbucket uses a freemium pricing model. Travis CI uses a paid pricing model. Confirm current rates with each vendor before deciding.
Can Bitbucket and Travis CI be self-hosted?
Bitbucket is not offered as a self-hosted option. Travis CI is not offered as a self-hosted option.